NASA Technical Standards Program (NTSP)

NASA Standards Hub

Complete reference for 83 NASA-STD, NASA-HDBK, and NASA-SPEC documents across 9 engineering discipline categories — plus commercial space programs, Artemis architecture, and governance framework.

NASA-STD (≈45)NASA-HDBK (≈37)NASA-SPEC (1)7 Commercial Programs60+ ASTM Cross-Refs

Overview

The NASA Technical Standards Program (NTSP) maintains the Agency's collection of technical standards, handbooks, and specifications. Documents are accessed via the NASA Technical Standards System (NTSS) at standards.nasa.gov. Directives (NPRs/NPDs) live in NODIS.

Document Types

NASA-STDMandatory "shall" requirements
NASA-HDBKGuidance "should" recommendations
NPR/NPDProcedural requirements & policy
NASA-SPECProduct specifications

Number Series

1000–1999 Systems Engineering

2000–2999 Comms & IT

3000–3999 Human Systems

4000–4999 Electrical

5000–5999 Structures/Mech

6000–6999 Materials

7000–7999 Test & Environment

8000–8999 Safety & SMA

10000+ Facilities

Key Facts

  • ✓ Program established 1997 by OCE
  • ✓ 83 active technical standards
  • ✓ 10 NASA Centers + JPL (FFRDC)
  • ✓ OMB A-119: prefer industry stds
  • ✓ "Internet Public" = freely downloadable
  • ✓ Feedback via NTSS portal

Governance Framework

Document Hierarchy (8 Levels)

LevelDocument TypePrefixNatureExample
1 — FederalU.S. Code / OMB CircularsLaw / Regulation51 U.S.C. § 20113; OMB A-119
2 — PolicyNASA Policy DirectiveNPDWhat (Policy)NPD 7120.4 — Engineering & PM Policy
3 — ProcedureNASA Procedural RequirementsNPRHow (Requirements)NPR 7120.5F — Space Flight PM
4 — StandardNASA Technical StandardNASA-STD-Mandatory ("shall")NASA-STD-5019A — Fracture Control
4 — SpecNASA SpecificationNASA-SPEC-Mandatory ("shall")NASA-SPEC-5022 — Pyrovalves
4 — HandbookNASA Technical HandbookNASA-HDBK-Guidance ("should")NASA-HDBK-2203 — Software Eng.
5 — CenterCenter Standards / CPR / CPDVariesCenter-specificJPL Design Principles, MSFC-SPEC-
6 — EndorsedOCE Endorsed StandardsVariesPick-list for programsAIAA, SAE, IEEE, ASTM, MIL-STD

Three Technical Authorities

Engineering Technical Authority (ETA) — Responsible for engineering design processes, specifications, rules, and best practices. Delegated by Center Directors.

Safety & Mission Assurance Technical Authority (SMA TA) — Independent safety oversight managed per NASA-STD-8709.20.

Health & Medical Technical Authority (HMTA) — Crew health/medical requirements compliance for human spaceflight.

Space Flight Program & Project Management

Lifecycle phases Pre-A through F, KDPs, life-cycle reviews, product requirements.

Systems Engineering Processes & Requirements

17 SE processes covering technical requirements, design, integration, and V&V.

Software Engineering Requirements

Mandatory software engineering, classification levels A–E, IV&V requirements.

Agency Risk Management

Risk identification, analysis, handling, and monitoring across all programs.

Lifecycle & Reviews

Governed by NPR 7120.5F. Phases Pre-A through B = Formulation; C through F = Implementation.

Pre-A

Concept Studies

→ KDP A

A

Concept & Tech Dev

MCR/SRR → KDP B

B

Preliminary Design

SDR/PDR → KDP C

C

Final Design & Fab

CDR → KDP D

D

Assembly, I&T

SIR/ORR → KDP E

E

Operations

FRR/DR → KDP F

F

Closeout

DR

Major Reviews (NPR 7123.1C)

ReviewFull NamePhasePurpose
MCRMission Concept ReviewPre-A/AEvaluates mission concepts and feasibility
SRRSystem Requirements ReviewACompleteness and consistency of requirements
SDRSystem Definition ReviewA/BSystem definition and allocated requirements
PDRPreliminary Design ReviewBPreliminary design and verification approach
CDRCritical Design ReviewCDetailed design readiness for fabrication
TRRTest Readiness ReviewC/DReadiness for formal test execution
SIRSystem Integration ReviewDSystem integration completeness
ORROperational Readiness ReviewDReadiness for operational deployment
FRRFlight Readiness ReviewEFinal go/no-go for each flight
DRDecommissioning ReviewE/FPlans for safe disposal or decommissioning

1000 Series — Systems Engineering & Project Management

Digital engineering, systems modeling, mission architecture, space system protection, and planetary environment testing. 5 documents.

StandardTitleDateType
NASA-HDBK-1004NASA Digital Engineering Acquisition Framework Handbook2020-04HDBK
NASA-HDBK-1005NASA Space Mission Architecture Framework (SMAF) for Uncrewed Missions2021-03HDBK
NASA-HDBK-1009ANASA Systems Modeling Handbook for Systems Engineering2025-03HDBK
NASA-STD-1006ASpace System Protection Standard2022-07STD
NASA-STD-1008Classifications & Requirements for Testing Systems Exposed to Dust in Planetary Environments2021-09STD
Core SE

SE Processes & Requirements

Defines the NASA "SE Engine" — 17 processes aligned with ISO/IEC 15288. Compliance matrix in Appendix H.

PM

Space Flight PM Requirements

Master PM framework for all space flight programs. Defines lifecycle, KDPs, reviews, WBS, and product-based approach.

Digital

Digital Engineering & MBSE

NASA-HDBK-1004 (acquisition framework), HDBK-1009A (SysML/MBSE guidance, 2025). Digital Thread and Digital Twin practices.

2000 Series — Communications & Information Technology

Standards for digital television, audio/video, and imagery metadata. The smallest discipline category — 3 active standards.

StandardTitleDateType
NASA-STD-2818Digital Television for NASAVer. 4.0 (2015)STD
NASA-STD-2821Audio and Video Standards for Internet ResourcesV2 (2020)STD
NASA-STD-2822Still and Motion Imagery Metadata Standard2.0 (2024)STD
Additional IT/communications requirements are addressed through NPR 7120.7 (IT Program Management) and center-specific standards.

3000 Series — Human Systems & Human-Rating

Standards ensuring crew health, safety, and the human-rating certification process for crewed space systems.

StandardTitleDateType
NPR 8705.2CHuman-Rating Requirements for Space SystemsCurrentNPR
NASA-STD-3001 Vol.1Spaceflight Human-System Standard — Crew Health (Vol 1C)2023STD
NASA-STD-3001 Vol.2Spaceflight Human-System Standard — Human Factors, Habitability (Vol 2E)2025STD
NASA-STD-8719.29Technical Requirements for Human-RatingSTD
Human-Rating Certification: Required before first crewed mission. Four certification elements: Programmatic, Design, Production, Operations. Compliance verified at SRR, SDR, PDR, CDR, SIR, ORR. Director, JSC accepts crew risk.

4000 Series — Electrical & Electronic Engineering

Spacecraft electrical systems, charging, lightning protection, high-voltage design, and programmable logic devices. 9 documents.

StandardTitleDateType
NASA-STD-4003AElectrical Bonding for Launch Vehicles, Spacecraft, Payloads & Flight Equipment2013 (Chg 2016)STD
NASA-STD-4005ALow Earth Orbit Spacecraft Charging Design Standard2016 (Chg 2021)STD
NASA-STD-4010ALightning Launch Commit Criteria for Space Flight2023STD
NASA-HDBK-4001AElectrical Grounding Architecture for Unmanned Spacecraft2025HDBK
NASA-HDBK-4002BMitigating In-Space Charging Effects — A Guideline2022HDBK
NASA-HDBK-4006ALow Earth Orbit Spacecraft Charging Design Handbook2018HDBK
NASA-HDBK-4007Spacecraft High-Voltage Paschen and Corona Design Handbook2016 (Chg 2020)HDBK
NASA-HDBK-4008Programmable Logic Devices (PLD) Handbook2013 (Chg 2025)HDBK
NASA-HDBK-4011VHDL Style Handbook2022HDBK

5000 Series — Structures, Mechanical & Propulsion

Structural factors of safety, fracture control, mechanisms, load analyses, fasteners, NDE, GSE design, and additive manufacturing. 13 documents.

StandardTitleDateType
NASA-STD-5001BStructural Design and Test Factors of Safety for Spaceflight Hardware2014 (Chg 2022)STD
NASA-STD-5002ALoad Analyses of Spacecraft and Payloads2019STD
NASA-STD-5005DDesign and Fabrication of Ground Support Equipment2013 (Chg 2024)STD
NASA-STD-5009CNDE Requirements for Fracture Critical Metallic Components2023STD
NASA-STD-5012BStrength & Life Assessment — Liquid-Fueled Propulsion System Engines2016STD
NASA-STD-5017BDesign and Development Requirements for Mechanisms2022STD
NASA-STD-5018Strength Design for Glass, Ceramics & Windows in Human Spaceflight2011 (Chg 2017)STD
NASA-STD-5019AFracture Control Requirements for Spaceflight Hardware2016 (Chg 2024)STD
NASA-STD-5020BRequirements for Threaded Fastening Systems in Spaceflight Hardware2021STD
NASA-SPEC-5022Manufacturing & Test Requirements for Pyrovalves2015 (Chg 2021)SPEC
NASA-HDBK-5010Fracture Control Implementation Handbook — Guidance (Vol 1 Rev A)2023HDBK
NASA-HDBK-5010Fracture Control Implementation Handbook — Examples (Vol 2 Rev A)2024HDBK
NASA-HDBK-5026Strength, Fatigue & Fracture Control for Additive Manufacturing Spaceflight Hardware2024HDBK

6000 Series — Materials & Processes

Flammability, corrosion, materials selection, additive manufacturing, atomic oxygen durability. 7 documents.

StandardTitleDateType
NASA-STD-6001BFlammability, Offgassing & Compatibility Requirements and Test Procedures2011 (Chg 2025)STD
NASA-STD-6012ACorrosion Protection for Space Flight Hardware2022STD
NASA-STD-6016CStandard Materials & Processes Requirements for Spacecraft2021 (Chg 2023)STD
NASA-STD-6030Additive Manufacturing Requirements for Spaceflight Systems2021STD
NASA-STD-6033AM Requirements for Equipment and Facility Control2021STD
NASA-HDBK-6007BMaterial Removal Processes for Advanced Ceramic Components2018 (Chg 2022)HDBK
NASA-HDBK-6024Spacecraft Polymers Atomic Oxygen Durability Handbook2014 (Chg 2022)HDBK

7000 Series — Test, Environment & Modeling

Vibroacoustic testing, payload requirements, models & simulations, leak testing, and DFAT. 7 documents.

StandardTitleDateType
NASA-STD-7001BPayload Vibroacoustic Test Criteria2017STD
NASA-STD-7002BPayload Test Requirements2018 (Chg 2023)STD
NASA-STD-7009BStandard for Models and Simulations2024STD
NASA-STD-7012ALeak Test Requirements2023STD
NASA-STD-1008Dust Testing in Planetary Environments2021STD
NASA-HDBK-7009AModels & Simulations Implementation Guide2019HDBK
NASA-HDBK-7010Direct Field Acoustic Testing (DFAT)2016HDBK

8000 Series — Safety, Quality & Mission Assurance

The largest discipline category. Covers system safety, SMA management, workmanship, orbital debris, software assurance, and safety culture. ~35 documents.

Key Safety & SMA Standards

StandardTitleDateType
NASA-STD-8709.20Management of SMA Technical Authority RequirementsSTD
NASA-HDBK-8709.22SMA Acronyms, Abbreviations & Definitions2018 (Chg 2021)HDBK
NASA-HDBK-8709.24NASA Safety Culture Handbook2015 (Chg 2021)HDBK
NASA-HDBK-8709.25Human Factors Handbook — Procedural Guidance & Tools2023HDBK
NASA-STD-8719.11BFire Protection and Life Safety2020STD
NASA-STD-8719.12ASafety Standard for Explosives, Propellants & Pyrotechnics2018STD
NASA-STD-8719.17DOrbital Debris Mitigation — NASA Requirements2023STD
NASA-STD-8719.27Implementing Planetary Protection Requirements2022STD
NASA-HDBK-8715.26Nuclear Flight Safety for Space Nuclear Systems2023HDBK

Workmanship Standards (8739 Series)

StandardTitleType
NASA-STD-8739.1Workmanship Standard for Polymeric Application on Electronic AssembliesSTD
NASA-STD-8739.4Crimping, Interconnect Cables, Harnesses & WiringSTD
NASA-STD-8739.5Fiber Optic Terminations, Cable Assemblies & InstallationSTD
NASA-STD-8739.6BImplementation Requirements for NASA Approved Workmanship StandardsSTD
NASA-STD-8739.8BSoftware Assurance and Software SafetySTD
NASA-STD-8739.14Fastener Procurement, Receiving Inspection & Storage for Mission HardwareSTD
NASA-HDBK-8739.18Procedural Handbook for Problems, Nonconformances & AnomaliesHDBK
NASA-HDBK-8739.19Measurement Quality Assurance Handbook (Annexes 2–4)HDBK
NASA-HDBK-8739.21Workmanship Manual for ESD ControlHDBK

10000 Series — Facilities Design & Infrastructure

Building Information Modeling (BIM) requirements and facility design standards for NASA centers. 2 documents.

StandardTitleDateType
NASA-STD-10001NASA Building Information Modeling Scope of Services & Requirements for Architects and Engineers2020STD
NASA-STD-10002NASA Facilities Design Standard2021STD
NASA-STD-10001 mandates BIM for all new construction and major renovations. Additional facility project requirements are managed under NPR 8820.2 (Facility Project Requirements).

Software Engineering (Cross-Cutting)

StandardTitleType
NPR 7150.2CNASA Software Engineering Requirements — defines classification A–E and lifecycle requirementsNPR
NASA-STD-8739.8BSoftware Assurance and Software Safety StandardSTD
NASA-HDBK-2203NASA Software Engineering Handbook (Rev B, wiki-based)HDBK
NASA-STD-7009BStandard for Models and Simulations — M&S credibility assessmentSTD

Software Classification (NPR 7150.2C)

ClassCriticalityExample
ACatastrophic failure impactHuman-rated flight control
BCritical failure impactMission critical systems
CSignificant failure impactScience payload software
DNegligible failure impactGround tools
EInformation only (legacy/COTS)Off-the-shelf OS

Commercial Space Programs — Overview

NASA's public-private partnership model — from ISS cargo in 2006 to lunar landing services and post-ISS commercial stations.

Program Timeline (2006–2025)

YearProgramMilestone
2006COTSCommercial Orbital Transportation Services initiated
2010CCDev1$50M SAAs — crew transport concept development (5 companies)
2011CCDev2$269M for crew vehicle development (Blue Origin, Boeing, SNC, SpaceX)
2012CRS-1First Commercial Resupply contracts (SpaceX Dragon, Orbital Cygnus)
2012CCiCap$1.1B — end-to-end crew systems (Boeing, SNC, SpaceX)
2014CCtCap$6.8B FAR contracts — Boeing ($4.82B), SpaceX ($3.14B)
2016CRS-22nd-gen resupply (SpaceX, Northrop, Sierra Nevada / Dream Chaser)
2018CLPSCommercial Lunar Payload Services — $2.6B IDIQ pool initiated
2020CCP OpsSpaceX Crew Dragon Demo-2 — first operational commercial crew
2020HLSSpaceX Starship HLS selected ($2.9B) for Artemis crewed landings
2021CLD$415.6M Phase 1 awards — Axiom, Starlab, Orbital Reef
2023HLS SustainBlue Origin Blue Moon selected as sustaining HLS ($3.4B)
2024CLPS LandingsIM-1 Odysseus (success), Blue Ghost-1 (success), Peregrine-1 (failed)
2025CLD Phase 2Revised AFP — $2.1B over 5 years, min 2 providers
Partnership Model: SAAs for development (milestone-based, company retains IP and design authority) → CPC/CCtCap for certification → FAR firm-fixed-price for operations. Commercial providers own the system and can sell capacity to other customers. Risk tolerance is higher; costs are 4–10× lower vs. traditional acquisition.

COTS & Commercial Resupply Services (CRS)

COTS — Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (2006–2013)

CompanyVehicleAwardResult
SpaceXDragon + Falcon 9$396MFirst private spacecraft to berth ISS (May 2012)
Orbital Sciences (now Northrop)Cygnus + Antares$288MFirst Cygnus ISS berthing (Jan 2014)
Rocketplane KistlerK-1 (terminated)$207M rescindedContract terminated Oct 2007 — non-performance

CRS-1 (2012–2024)

CompanyVehicleContractMissions
SpaceXDragon (Cargo)$1.6B20 missions (CRS-1 through CRS-20)
Northrop GrummanCygnus$1.9B11 missions (OA/NG-1 through NG-11)

CRS-2 (2016–present)

CompanyVehicleContractKey Features
SpaceXCargo Dragon 2~$3.04BAutonomous docking, pressurized + unpressurized cargo
Northrop GrummanCygnus (Enhanced)~$3.04BDisposal capability, extended missions
Sierra SpaceDream Chaser~$3.04BWinged vehicle, runway landing, cargo return, first flight 2025

Commercial Crew Program (CCP)

Program Phases & Funding ($8.2B+ Total)

PhaseMechanismPeriodFundingCompanies
CCDev1Space Act Agreement2010$50MBlue Origin ($3.7M), Boeing ($18M), SNC ($20M), ULA ($6.7M)
CCDev2Space Act Agreement2011–14$269MBlue Origin ($22M), Boeing ($92M), SNC ($80M), SpaceX ($75M)
CCiCapSpace Act Agreement2012–14$1.1BBoeing ($460M), SNC ($212M), SpaceX ($440M)
CPCFAR Contract2012–14$30MBoeing, SNC, SpaceX (~$10M each)
CCtCapFAR FFP2014–present$6.8BBoeing ($4.82B), SpaceX ($3.14B)
Operational

SpaceX Crew Dragon

Capsule, 4 crew + cargo. Autonomous docking. Falcon 9 launch. First operational flight Crew-1 (Nov 2020). 10+ crew rotation missions through 2025. Also: Ax-1/2/3, Inspiration4, Polaris Dawn.

CCtCap: $3.14B · Operational since 2020

Limited Ops

Boeing CST-100 Starliner

OFT-2 (May 2022) success. CFT (Jun 2024) docked but returned uncrewed due to thruster issues. Crew returned on SpaceX Crew-9. Boeing reviewing future of space business.

CCtCap: $4.82B · Certification: In review

CCT-STD-1140 — Crew Transportation Technical Standards — master requirements document. Covers all mission phases: pre-launch, ascent, orbital, rendezvous/docking, ISS-attached, undocking, re-entry, landing. Providers may propose Alternate Standards and request Variances.

Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS)

Rapid, affordable robotic lunar payload delivery for Artemis pathfinding. IDIQ pool — $2.6B max through Nov 2028. 14 eligible U.S. vendors. NASA buys service, not hardware.

Intuitive Machines

Nova-C lander. Houston, TX. 4 task orders. IM-1 (Feb 2024 — first commercial lunar landing), IM-2 (2025, south pole), IM-3 (2025–26, Reiner Gamma), IM-4 (2027).

Firefly Aerospace

Blue Ghost lander. Cedar Park, TX. 4 task orders. BG-1 (Jan 2025, Mare Crisium — success), BG-2 (2026, far side), BG-3 (2027), BG-4 (2028, CSA rover).

Astrobotic Technology

Peregrine & Griffin landers. Pittsburgh, PA. 2 task orders. Peregrine-1 (Jan 2024 — propellant leak, failed). Griffin (2025 — south pole).

Draper / Team Draper

APEX 1.0 lander. Cambridge, MA. 1 task order. Schrödinger Basin far side (2026) — seismometers, heat flow, subsurface measurements.

Blue Origin

Blue Moon Mark 1. Kent, WA. 1 task order. Demo flight (2025). Also delivering VIPER rover (2027).

Other Eligible Vendors

Ceres Robotics, Deep Space Systems, Lockheed Martin, Masten (bankrupt — assets to Astrobotic), Moon Express, Sierra Space, SpaceX, Tyvak.

Mission Status

MissionProviderDateSiteStatusValue
Peregrine-1AstroboticJan 2024Lacus Mortis (planned)✗ Failed — propellant leak$108M
IM-1 (Odysseus)Intuitive MachinesFeb 2024Malapert A (south pole)✓ Landed (tipped)$118M
Blue Ghost-1FireflyJan 2025Mare Crisium✓ Landed — success$93.3M
IM-2Intuitive Machines2025Mons Mouton (south pole)⚠ Landed (tipped)$47M
GriffinAstrobotic2025Mons MoutonIn preparation$320.4M
IM-3Intuitive Machines2025–26Reiner GammaManifested$77.5M
Blue Moon DemoBlue Origin2025TBDIn development
Draper SERIES-2Team Draper2026Schrödinger (far side)In development$73M

Commercial LEO Destinations (CLD)

Privately-owned stations to replace ISS (~2030 retirement). Critical timeline: NASA's OIG warns commercial platform unlikely before 2030. FY2026: $272.3M requested; $2.1B projected over 5 years.

PhaseMechanismScopeStatus
Phase 1 — CDISSFFP Contract ($140M)Axiom Space — ISS-attached modules → free-flyingActive (AxH1 targeted 2026–27)
Phase 1 — CDFFFunded SAAs ($415.6M)Free-flying station design maturation through 2025Complete
Phase 2Funded SAAs (revised 2025)CDR readiness + in-space crewed demo. Min 2 providers. ~$1.5BAFP expected 2025, awards 2026
CDISS

Axiom Station

Modules attached to ISS, then detach for free-flying ops. AxH1 module targeted 2026–27. Has flown Ax-1/2/3 private missions. $140M NASA + private investment.

CDFF — $160M

Starlab

Voyager Space + Airbus + Northrop. Single-launch on Starship. 4 crew. George Washington Carver Science Park labs. Power/volume ≈ ISS. Target: 2028–29.

CDFF — $130M

Orbital Reef

Blue Origin + Sierra Space + Boeing. Modular "business park". Up to 10 crew, 830 m³. Includes LIFE inflatable habitat. Progress slowed 2024.

Unfunded SAA

Vast — Haven-1/2

Haven-1: single module, Q1 2027 on Falcon 9, 4 crew for 2-week missions. Haven-2: larger multi-module. Bidding for CLD Phase 2. Private funding from Jed McCaleb.

2025 Phase 2 Revised Strategy: Goal adjusted to 4-person crews for month-long missions. SAA includes milestones to CDR readiness + in-space crewed demo (non-NASA crew). Min 25% paid after successful demo. Min 2, preferably 3+ providers. International partners welcome.

Human Landing System (HLS)

Commercial lunar landers enabling Artemis crewed surface missions — the first human Moon landings since Apollo 17 in 1972.

Initial Provider

SpaceX Starship HLS

Contract: $2.89B (Apr 2021), augmented for Artemis IV. Based on Starship architecture with orbital refueling. Will land 2 astronauts on lunar south pole for Artemis III. Requires multiple tanker launches. First uncrewed demo required before crewed mission.

Artemis III · Artemis IV

Sustaining Provider

Blue Origin Blue Moon

Contract: $3.4B (May 2023). Mark 2 lander for Artemis V and beyond. Partners: Lockheed Martin, Draper, Boeing, Astrobotic, Honeybee Robotics. Designed for reusability. Mark 1 demo under separate CLPS contract.

Artemis V+ · Blue Moon Mark 1 & 2

HLS Certification: CCtCap-like framework adapted for lunar missions. Providers comply with NPR 8705.2C intent, NASA-STD-3001 Vol.1, and safety requirements via Alternate Standards, VCNs, and Hazard Reports. NASA maintains Technical Authority oversight while providers retain design authority.

Artemis Program Architecture

Mission Manifest

MissionDate (NET)TypeCrewSLSKey ObjectivesStatus
Artemis INov 2022Uncrewed testBlock 1SLS maiden flight, Orion heat shield test, DRO 25.5-day mission✓ Complete
Artemis IIMar 2026Crewed flyby4Block 1First crewed SLS/Orion; lunar free-return ~10 days; crew: Wiseman, Glover, Koch, Hansen (CSA)On pad — wet dress rehearsal
Artemis IIINET 2028Crewed landing4 (2 land)Block 1First crewed lunar landing since 1972; south pole; Starship HLS; Axiom xEVAS suits. May be replanned.In development — delays
Artemis IVNET Sep 2028Gateway + Landing4Block 1BDeliver I-Hab to Gateway; first crewed Gateway visit; lunar surface via HLSIn development
Artemis VNET 2030Gateway + Landing4Block 1BDeliver Lunar View; Blue Origin Blue Moon HLS; sustained operationsPlanning
Artemis VI–VIII2030sSustained4Block 1B/2Routine Gateway ops; extended surface stays; ISRU demos; Mars prepPlanning
⚠ Schedule Uncertainty (Feb 2026): Artemis II on pad at LC-39B targeting March 2026. Artemis III pushed to NET 2028 due to Starship HLS delays and Orion heat shield issues. FY2026 budget proposes cancelling SLS/Orion after Artemis III and the Gateway program, shifting to commercial alternatives. Funded through FY2032 by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act ($2.6B for Gateway).

Architecture Elements

Launch

Space Launch System (SLS)

Block 1: 95 mT LEO, 27 mT TLI. 322 ft, 8.8M lbs thrust. 4× RS-25 + 2× 5-segment SRBs. ICPS upper stage. Block 1B: EUS for Artemis IV+, 38 mT TLI. Block 2 (future): 130 mT LEO. ~$4.1B per launch. MSFC managed, Boeing prime.

Crew

Orion MPCV

Deep space capsule, 4 crew, up to 30+ days with Gateway. LAS for full ascent abort capability. European Service Module (ESA/Airbus): 33 kN OMS-E, 4× solar arrays 11.1 kW. AVCOAT ablative heat shield. Skip-entry at ~25,000 mph / 5,000°F. JSC managed, Lockheed Martin prime.

Station

Gateway — Initial Config

PPE (Maxar, $375M): 60 kW SEP, 50 kW power, xenon ion AEPS thrusters. HALO (Northrop/Thales Alenia, $935M): first habitable module, C&DH, life support, docking ports. Launched together on Falcon Heavy (NET 2027). NRHO ~1,000–43,500 mi from Moon surface.

Future

Gateway — Expansion

Lunar I-Hab (ESA/JAXA/Thales Alenia): enhanced habitation, ECLSS. Arrives Artemis IV. Lunar View (ESA): refueling, logistics. Canadarm3 (CSA): autonomous robotic arm. Crew & Science Airlock (MBRSC/UAE). International partners: ESA, JAXA, CSA, MBRSC.

Applicable Standards Across Artemis

DomainStandardsApplication
Human RatingSLS, Orion, HLS, xEVAS — certification before crewed missions
Crew HealthCrew health, human factors, habitability for all crewed elements
StructuresFactors of safety, fracture control for SLS, Orion, Gateway
MaterialsM&P requirements, flammability/offgassing for pressurized volumes
SoftwareFlight software — Orion, SLS avionics, Gateway C&DH
SafetyGeneral safety; orbital debris for Gateway
TestVibroacoustic, payload testing for all flight hardware
Systems Eng.SE processes, lifecycle management across Artemis elements

Complete Standards List

All 83 active NASA Technical Standards at standards.nasa.gov/all-standards ↗

SeriesDisciplineCountDocuments (STD/HDBK)
1000Systems Engineering & Project Mgmt53 HDBK, 2 STD
2000Communications & IT41 HDBK, 3 STD
3000Human Systems22 STD
4000Electrical & Electronic93 STD, 6 HDBK
5000Structures, Mechanical, Propulsion139 STD, 3 HDBK, 1 SPEC
6000Materials & Processes75 STD, 2 HDBK
7000Test, Environment & Modeling74 STD, 3 HDBK
8000Safety, Quality, Reliability~35Largest category
10000Facilities Design22 STD

Key NPR / NPD Index

Available at nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov ↗

DocumentTitleDomain
NPD 1000.0NASA Governance and Strategic Management HandbookGovernance
NPD 7120.4NASA Engineering and Program/Project Management PolicyPolicy
NPR 7120.5FNASA Space Flight Program and Project Management RequirementsProgram Mgmt
NPR 7120.7NASA IT and Institutional Infrastructure PM RequirementsIT programs
NPR 7120.8NASA Research and Technology PM RequirementsR&T programs
NPR 7120.10BTechnical Standards for NASA Programs and ProjectsStandards gov.
NPR 7123.1CNASA Systems Engineering Processes and RequirementsSys. Engineering
NPR 7150.2CNASA Software Engineering RequirementsSoftware
NPR 8000.4Agency Risk Management Procedural RequirementsRisk Mgmt
NPR 8705.2CHuman-Rating Requirements for Space SystemsHuman Rating
NPR 8705.4Risk Classification for NASA PayloadsRisk class.
NPR 8705.5Technical PRA Procedures for Safety and Mission SuccessPRA
NPR 8705.6SMA Audits, Reviews, and AssessmentsSMA oversight
NPR 8715.3CNASA General Safety Program RequirementsSafety
NPR 8735.2Management of QA Functions for NASA ContractsQuality
NPR 8900.1Health and Medical Requirements for Human Space ExplorationCrew health

Cross-Reference: NASA ↔ ECSS ↔ Industry

DomainNASAECSSIndustry Standards
Systems EngineeringNPR 7123.1CECSS-E-ST-10C Rev.1ISO/IEC 15288, INCOSE SE HB
Program ManagementNPR 7120.5FECSS-M-ST-10C Rev.1PMI PMBOK
Human RatingNPR 8705.2CFAA 14 CFR Part 460
Software EngineeringNPR 7150.2CECSS-E-ST-40C Rev.1DO-178C, IEEE 12207
Software AssuranceNASA-STD-8739.8BECSS-Q-ST-80C Rev.1DO-178C, IEC 61508-3
Structural DesignNASA-STD-5001BECSS-E-ST-32C Rev.1AIAA S-110, S-111
Fracture ControlNASA-STD-5019AECSS-E-ST-32-01C Rev.2MIL-STD-1530
SafetyNPR 8715.3CECSS-Q-ST-40C Rev.1MIL-STD-882E, IEC 61508
FMEA/FMECANPR 8715.3 (ref)ECSS-Q-ST-30-02CMIL-STD-1629, IEC 60812
Materials & ProcessesNASA-STD-6016CECSS-Q-ST-70C Rev.2ASTM, MIL-HDBK-5
Electrical BondingNASA-STD-4003AECSS-E-ST-20C Rev.2MIL-STD-464
Orbital DebrisNASA-STD-8719.17DECSS-U-AS-10C Rev.2ISO 24113

Glossary & Abbreviations

CCDev
Commercial Crew Development
CCtCap
Commercial Crew Transportation Capability
CDR
Critical Design Review
CLD
Commercial LEO Destinations
CLPS
Commercial Lunar Payload Services
CoFR
Certification of Flight Readiness
COTS
Commercial Orbital Transportation Services
CPC
Certification Products Contract
CRS
Commercial Resupply Services
ETA
Engineering Technical Authority
EVA
Extravehicular Activity
FRR
Flight Readiness Review
Gateway
Lunar Orbital Platform-Gateway
GNC
Guidance, Navigation & Control
HALO
Habitation and Logistics Outpost
HLS
Human Landing System
HMTA
Health & Medical Technical Authority
HRCP
Human Rating Certification Package
ISS
International Space Station
IV&V
Independent Verification & Validation
JSC
Johnson Space Center
KDP
Key Decision Point
KSC
Kennedy Space Center
MBSE
Model-Based Systems Engineering
MSFC
Marshall Space Flight Center
NODIS
NASA Online Directives Information System
NPD
NASA Policy Directive
NPR
NASA Procedural Requirements
NRHO
Near-Rectilinear Halo Orbit
NTSP
NASA Technical Standards Program
OCE
Office of the Chief Engineer
OSMA
Office of Safety & Mission Assurance
PDR
Preliminary Design Review
PPE
Power and Propulsion Element
PRA
Probabilistic Risk Assessment
SAA
Space Act Agreement
SEMP
Systems Engineering Management Plan
SLS
Space Launch System
SMA
Safety & Mission Assurance
SRR
System Requirements Review
TA
Technical Authority
TLI
Trans-Lunar Injection
VCN
Verification Closure Notice
xEVAS
Axiom Extravehicular Mobility Unit

Resources & NASA Centers

NASA Centers

CenterCodeLocationKey Roles
Johnson Space CenterJSCHouston, TXHuman spaceflight, crew systems, mission control, human rating
Kennedy Space CenterKSCCape Canaveral, FLLaunch operations, Commercial Crew Program
Marshall Space Flight CenterMSFCHuntsville, ALSLS, propulsion, structural standards
Goddard Space Flight CenterGSFCGreenbelt, MDEarth science, space science, NODIS host
Jet Propulsion LaboratoryJPLPasadena, CADeep space missions, Mars rovers, FFRDC (Caltech)
Langley Research CenterLaRCHampton, VAAeronautics, atmospheric science, systems analysis
Glenn Research CenterGRCCleveland, OHPropulsion, power systems, communications
Ames Research CenterARCMoffett Field, CAComputing, thermal protection, astrobiology
Stennis Space CenterSSCBay St. Louis, MSRocket engine testing (RS-25, SLS)
Armstrong Flight ResearchAFRCEdwards AFB, CAFlight research and testing